by David Phelps

“Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.” – Mother Teresa

March, 2025

My wife, Charlotte, can verify that I can be a bit contrary sometimes—actually, at times, more than a bit. My contrariness was triggered recently by a devotional written by retired missionary Rev. Stan Kruis about the early apostle Apollos (https://todaydevotional.com/devotions/priscilla-and-aquila).

Apollos (Acts 18:24-28) was a Jew who had accepted the Gospel of Christ. He was well versed in the Hebrew scriptures and an eloquent orator. He arrived in Ephesus and began teaching others about Jesus. But he had only heard about the baptism of John the Baptist. Most English Bible translations say something to the effect that Paul’s friends, Priscilla and Aquila, “. . . took him aside, and explained to him the way of God more accurately.” (18:26 ESV). But I like the way the Complete Jewish Bible expresses it: “. . . they took him aside and explained to him the Way of God in fuller detail.” But Rev. Kruis wrote that “. . . his teaching about Jesus needed some correction. So Priscilla and Aquila invited him to their home and helped him get on track.”

Perhaps it’s just me but this seemed somewhat unfair to Apollos. There was nothing wrong with what he was preaching. He wasn’t saying anything contrary to the Gospel. Acts says “. . . he spoke and taught accurately the things concerning Jesus,” (vs. 25b ESV, emphasis added). He just needed to go further, needed a small nudge, and Priscilla and Aquila were there to fill in the missing details of his knowledge.

The Expositor’s Greek Testament suggests that Christian baptism was fundamentally different from that practiced by John. While John had baptized “‘for repentance’” (Matt. 3:11), Jesus instructed his disciples to “‘. . . make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,’” (28:19 ESV). However, this doesn’t suggest that Apollos was terribly wrong. He needed further education, but who among us doesn’t? That doesn’t necessarily mean we’re any more or less wrong than anyone else. Apollos went on to be an effective apostle. Paul mentioned him several times in his first letter to the Corinthians (1:12, 3:4-6, 3:22, 4:6, 16:12) and again to his friend Titus (3:13).

But there’s a human tendency to regard someone who doesn’t know something we do as “wrong,” “uninformed,” or worse. A prominent presidential advisor recently called someone who corrected him “retarded,” a far cry from Lincoln’s “. . . malice toward none with charity for all . . .”

For my part, maybe I simply identify with Apollos. Maybe it seemed Rev. Kruis was selling him short or judging him unfairly, a position in which I’ve found myself more than once. And maybe I need to be more aware of times when I unfairly judge other Christians who disagree with me. Or maybe Rev. Kruis was wrong. Nobody deliberately sets out to be wrong. My wife, Charlotte, can verify that I can be wrong without trying.

When we see or interact with others who believe differently than we do, let’s remember that not everyone makes the same assumptions we do. Yet I also firmly believe there are people and ideas that are simply wrong. And while we don’t necessarily need to attack them, neither can we afford to let them go unchallenged. Instead, as Paul told the Corinthians, “. . . the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds.” (2 Cor. 10:4 ESV). Ours is a battle of worldviews, as much as a battle for souls.


“And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness.” (2 Tim. 2:24-25a ESV.)



Copyright © 2025 by David Phelps